View Single Post
Old July 28th, 2011, 10:56 PM   #34
catherine3678a
Master Pilot
 
catherine3678a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 142
Default Re: Aurora class Slipstream Prototype

Quote:
Originally Posted by evil_genius_180 View Post
That's not a severe necro post, it's only a moderate one. It's the noobs who dredge up a 5-6 year old WIP thread to ask a question or make a comment just to get their 5 posts to be able to download. That's a sever necro post.

Very nice work as usual, BorgMan. Not only on the ship but on the story as well, you had me captivated. The separate bridge unit and the slipstream only working with it docked is a really neat idea. I can't wait to see more.
Oh what wonderful terms we find in here. That sounds like fun. There is actually one website that has thousands, and I mean thousands of posts ... and I just love going back to "in the beginning" and finding all the posts that have "0" replies, just to bump 'em. Hmmm ... hehehe ... oh well not tonight.

Then in the twilight of reality there are some who ponder "how much bandwidth can this website handle". With enough people to REALLY slow down a MAJOR website, thou asketh for 5 posts per ... well, let's see ... number I saw over there, something like 75,000 ... okay 75,000 times 5 posts [good luck though, they don't all post in the other one either] ... but 75,000 times 5 = about 375,000 posts. Plus a few pics of course. Plus then they'd be downloading all whatever. Then there may be a few more questions, like where is the .obj or tS or ??? for the bridge?!! [It's okay, I'll go make my own]

Having uploaded a few ST items here and there ... there's a big difference between success in sharing with obstacles and without. If the purpose is to limit downloads to as few people as possible, well congrats. If the purpose is to share your lovely work with as many ST fans as possible, well ... and those that would converse would still converse. Esp if they've been up half the night drinking coffee.
catherine3678a is offline   Reply With Quote