Quote:
Originally Posted by evil_genius_180
Thanks. I try to use stuff that's not been used too much in canon Trek and "Oberon" hasn't been used at all. (other moons have  ) The Luna-class ships technically aren't canon, but I have no problem stipulating that the Luna-class Oberon could be a successor to this one.
The problem is, the numbers are inconsistent. 23rd century vessels should always have three or four digits. However, it's not certain how high the numbers got by the year 2300 or if the number ranges vary by class.
So, all said and done, this stuff doesn't make sense. Likely, the art department just slapped numbers on these things. I figured NCC-30852 was a "safe" number for the mid 24th century. |
NCC-30852 sounds logical for a Ship in this era.
I´ve tried to fix the Reg.Problem in my FF´s (a little bit
) by saving some Regs for specific ship-classes (e.g. 2xxx for older EXCELSIOR´s - 10xxx till 29xxx mostly for AMBASSADOR´s - 19xxx mostly for newer OBERTH´s, commissioned in the 24th century - 30xxx often for newer MIRANDA´s - 4xxxx often for newer EXCELSIOR´s)
Some other classes have just higher Regs how newer they are.
Here you can find a list of my FF-Ships with Classes and Regs to see what I mean (ca. 30-40 are Canon - the Rest ca. 210-220 are FF).
-->
http://de.scififanfiction.wikia.com/..._Sternenflotte
